Eleven crazy learnings from the Java 11 certification: passing arguments to method references (11/11)
In the summer of 2021, I got my Java 11 certification. I expected it to be quite a breeze, because I’d been a Java developer for 14 years and surely I should have seen it all by now, right? Turned out I was very wrong. I came across lots of things that I didn’t even know were possible with Java. In this weekly blog series I will go through 11 of these ‘crazy learnings’ that surprised me the most, even as an experienced developer. The final ‘crazy learning’ I’ll be blogging about has to do with method references.
Prefering method references over lambdas
Using a method reference instead of a lambda expression can make your code more concise and readable. Whenever I can, I use a method reference rather than a lambda expression. And modern IDEs like IntelliJ IDEA will even suggest to turn a lambda into a method reference.
Lambda expressions that take parameters
However, when a lambda expression takes a parameter, I used to just leave the lambda there - I didn’t really know how to turn it into a method reference. Because it almost seemed impossible to let the method reference take a parameter. Right?!
Well, when I studied for my OCP Java Developer 11 exam, I learned that there actually is a way to achieve this. Let’s illustrate it with a code example.
Modelling a conference venue
Imagine we want to model a conference venue. Let’s say a venue has a name and a certain capacity. And we want to provide constructors to provide both name and capacity, or just one of them, or even none of them:
public class Venue {
final String name;
final int capacity;
final static String DEFAULT_NAME = "Anonymous venue";
final static int DEFAULT_CAPACITY = 0;
Venue() {
this(DEFAULT_NAME, DEFAULT_CAPACITY);
}
Venue(String name) {
this(name, DEFAULT_CAPACITY);
}
Venue(int capacity) {
this(DEFAULT_NAME, capacity);
}
Venue(String name, int capacity) {
this.name = name;
this.capacity = capacity;
}
}
Creating a Venue using a lambda expression
Now, could we create a Venue
using a lambda expression?
Sure we can!
// 1. call the default constructor
Supplier<Venue> anonymousVenueSupplier = () -> new Venue();
// 2. call the constructor with a String argument
Supplier<Venue> tinyClassroomSupplier = () -> new Venue("Classroom");
// 3. call the constructor with an int argument
Supplier<Venue> largeAnonymousVenueSupplier = () -> new Venue(200);
// 4. call the constructor with both a String and an int argument
Supplier<Venue> regularClassroomSupplier = () -> new Venue("Classroom", 30);
Creating a Venue using a method reference
OK, so we can call all four constructor overloads from within a lambda. Now, could we also make this work with method references?
// 1. call the default constructor
Supplier<Venue> anonymousVenueSupplier = Venue::new;
// 2. how can I pass a value to a method reference? 🤔
Supplier<Venue> tinyClassroomSupplier = Venue::new("Classroom"); // doesn't compile!
Obviously what we tried at #2 doesn’t work. To get to the solution we have to think about what a method reference actually tries to accomplish.
The method reference at #1 gets the reference of the Venue
constructor that does not take any argument. This is also indicated by the type of the variable tinyClassroomSupplier
- which is Supplier<Venue>
. As you may recall, the functional interface Supplier
serves as an interface for lambdas that expect no parameters, but produce a return value. So what if we would try a different functional interface here? (one that can take a parameter)
// 2. call the constructor with a String argument
Function<String, Venue> tinyClassroomFunction = Venue::new;
tinyClassroomFunction.apply("Classroom");
Yay, we have valid code on our hands! 🥳
Because our method reference is a Function<String, Venue>
here, it will get the reference of the Venue
constructor that takes a single String
argument.
And we can provide a value for Venue.name
by passing it to an invocation of Function.apply
.
We can call the constructor overload that takes an int using the same way:
// 3. call the constructor with an int argument
Function<Integer, Venue> largeAnonymousVenueFunction = Venue::new;
largeAnonymousVenueFunction.apply(200);
This works because of autoboxing - alternatively we could have used an IntFunction<Venue>
which will work with int
primitives directly.
Calling a constructor with two arguments
Now if a Function
enables us to call a method or constructor that expect a single argument, what would we need when we want to provide two arguments?
In such a case we can use a BiFunction
, like so:
BiFunction<String, Integer, Venue> regularClassroomBiFunction = Venue::new;
regularClassroomBiFunction.apply("Classroom", 30);
So by assigning a method reference to a functional interface type that takes a parameter (like Function
as we’ve seen, but Consumer
can also work - when no return type is required), it is possible to pass arguments to it.
And I never knew about this, until I came across it during my preparations for the OCP Java Developer exam.
But I’m really glad I did!
Photo by Pavel Danilyuk from Pexels
Conclusion of this series
This was the final chapter of my “Eleven Crazy Learnings from the Java 11 Certification” blog series. I hope you’ve enjoyed reading it. If you should decide to get Java Certified yourself, I do recommend you write down the things you didn’t know yet - just like I did. It will help you remember your own ‘crazy learnings’ a bit better.
It will probably take me a bit longer than a week to publish the next blog post (the weekly schedule that went on for 11 weeks has taken its toll on me 🙂), but don’t worry - I’ll continue posting regularly about all things Java, software development and public speaking. Until next time! 👋
Other blog posts in this series
Did you miss a blog post in this series? Here’s a list of all posts that have been published so far:
- A few freaky array declarations
- Stream elements should implement Comparable
- Accessing static interface methods
- Anonymous subclasses in enums
- Division by zero
- Method overloading priorities
- The crazy stuff that is allowed in switch statements
- Equality in cloned arrays
- Wrapper objects: some are more equal than others
- Functional interfaces actually CAN contain multiple abstract methods
- Passing arguments to method references